California
California State Auditor
Published January 5, 2021

Proposition 56 Tobacco Tax State Agencies’ Weak Administration Reduced Revenue by Millions of Dollars and Led to the Improper Use and Inadequate Disclosure of Funds

Learn how the AI-generated research projects were created

Overall Conclusion

The audit concludes that inaccuracies in CDTFA’s tax rate calculation and insufficient safeguards and public disclosure across several agencies impeded program integrity, resulting in potential revenue losses and misallocation of Prop 56 funds intended for health and public health programs.

Source Document

Audit Scope

Scope includes fiscal years 2017-18 through 2019-20 and reviews the calculation, distribution, and use of Proposition 56 tobacco tax revenues across selected state agencies and programs, including reporting practices and governance controls.

Key Findings Summary

1

CDTFA used inaccurate data to calculate the tax rate for other tobacco products, including excluding discount and deep-discount cigarettes and applying an allegedly arbitrary 6 percent wholesale markup, resulting in potential revenue losses of millions.

2

State agencies receiving Proposition 56 funds did not consistently implement safeguards to ensure funds were awarded and monitored for allowable purposes; some grants did not comply with statutory requirements.

3

Several agencies failed or were late in publishing required information on Prop 56 funds on their websites for fiscal years 2017–18 and 2018–19, limiting public oversight.

View the Findings tab to see all 5 findings

AI-Assisted

Generated by gpt-5-nano

AI Scope Summary

Future audits could build on this work by evaluating the continued accuracy of tax-rate calculations for other tobacco products, the adequacy of safeguards for Proposition 56 fund distribution, and the transparency of reporting across all agencies, with a focus on ensuring funds reach intended health and disparities-reduction programs in underserved areas.

AI-Generated Insight

The report highlights governance and data accuracy gaps that undermine the effectiveness of Prop 56 funding. Strengthening data sources, updating rate calculations, and formalizing grant oversight and disclosure are critical to ensure revenue is maximized and funds meet public health objectives.