Maryland
Maryland Office of Legislative Audits
Published December 14, 2023

Maryland Department of Health Medical Care Programs Administration Managed Care Program Audit Report

Learn how the AI-generated research projects were created

Overall Conclusion

MDH’s corrective actions addressing the identified audit issues are considered sufficient to address all audit issues.

Source Document

Audit Scope

The audit scope covered a fiscal compliance review of the Maryland Department of Health (MDH) – Medical Care Programs Administration (MCPA) focused on the Managed Care Program (HealthChoice) for the period April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2022. It examined the MCPA’s monitoring of enrollment and disenrollment of Medicaid recipients in MCOs, the calculations of MCO capitation rates, and the oversight and processing of capitation and related payments. The audit included the use of MMIS II data, DPSCS incarceration data for cross-checking incarcerated individuals enrolled in HealthChoice, and the independent verification by a private accounting firm and a State university to support capitation rate calculations. The audit explicitly excluded procedures and controls over MCPA’s primary functions beyond HealthChoice, and excluded MDH’s other units and programs (e.g., Behavioral Health Administration’s Administrative Service Organization, the Maryland Pharmacy Program) which are reviewed in separate audits. The period under review spans April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2022.

Key Findings Summary

1

Finding 3 – Improper Medicaid Payments: MCPA did not have an effective process to identify capitation payments to MCOs for incarcerated individuals, resulting in approximately $14 million in improper payments during fiscal years 2019 to 2022.

2

Finding 4 – MCPA did not investigate and recover potentially improper supplemental payments to MCOs for newborn deliveries totaling $10.4 million.

3

Finding 1 – Capitation Rate Calculations: MCPA procedures were not sufficiently comprehensive to ensure the validity of MCO-reported expenditure data used in the capitation rate calculation.

View the Findings tab to see all 4 findings

AI-Assisted

Generated by gpt-5-nano

AI Scope Summary

Assess the adequacy of MCPA's capitation rate calculation processes, identify ineligible and improperly paid costs (including incarcerated individuals and carved-out services), and evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls and corrective actions.

AI-Generated Insight

This audit highlights substantial governance and data integrity gaps in MDH's management of HealthChoice capitation payments, including inadequate validation of MCO-reported expenditures, insufficient controls to exclude ineligible costs, incomplete tracking of incarcerated individuals leading to substantial improper payments, and lack of timely investigation into newborn delivery supplemental claims. The agency has since implemented corrective actions and worked with independent auditors to address data quality concerns, demonstrating progress toward more accurate capitation rate setting and stronger financial oversight that could improve Medicaid program integrity and cost containment.

Audit Objectives

1

Examine MCPA’s financial transactions, records, and internal control.

2

Evaluate MCPA’s compliance with applicable State laws, rules, and regulations.

3

Review MCPA’s monitoring of enrollment and disenrollment in Medicaid Managed Care Organizations (MCOs), capitation rate calculations, and oversight and processing of related payments.

Audit Findings (4)

1

Finding 3 – Improper Medicaid Payments: MCPA did not have an effective process to identify capitation payments to MCOs for incarcerated individuals, resulting in approximately $14 million in improper payments during fiscal years 2019 to 2022.

2

Finding 4 – MCPA did not investigate and recover potentially improper supplemental payments to MCOs for newborn deliveries totaling $10.4 million.

3

Finding 1 – Capitation Rate Calculations: MCPA procedures were not sufficiently comprehensive to ensure the validity of MCO-reported expenditure data used in the capitation rate calculation.

4

Finding 2 – MCPA did not have comprehensive procedures to ensure that ineligible costs reported by the MCOs were excluded from the capitation rate calculation.

Recommendations (11)

1

Recommendation 4a: Investigate the propriety of all potentially improper newborn delivery supplemental claims.

2

Recommendation 4b: Recover any amounts paid for improper claims, including those noted above.

3

Recommendation 1a: Develop a more comprehensive methodology to validate the expenditure data used to calculate MCO capitation rates, including whether statistical sampling could be used to provide projections to the population of claims or capitation categories.

4

Recommendation 1b: MDH/MCPA should take appropriate action, including expanding its review when reviews of MCO claims identify discrepancies and reduce cycle time for HFMR reviews.

5

Recommendation 2a: Review claims denied by MMIS II and ensure improper payments are excluded from the expenditure data used in the capitation rate calculation.

6

Recommendation 2b: Use available MCO data to ensure duplicate payments are not made for carved-out services and develop a reconciliation with BHASO for carved-out behavioral health claims.

7

Recommendation 2c: Ensure claims paid for incarcerated individuals are excluded from the expenditure data used in the capitation rate calculation.

8

Recommendation 2d: Take corrective action to address carved-out service claims that were improperly paid.

9

Recommendation 3a: Work with DPSCS to obtain complete and accurate incarceration data for its match and engage the assistance of the Department of Budget and Management Audit Compliance Unit as necessary to resolve the matter.

10

Recommendation 3b: Ensure incarcerated individuals are timely disenrolled from MCOs to prevent improper capitation payments.

11

Recommendation 3c: Investigate the potential improper payments identified and take corrective action such as recovery of improper payments.